Mastering Note-Taking: Digital vs. Analog

The Age-Old Debate

For centuries, the pen has been mightier than the sword. But is it mightier than the laptop? The debate between handwritten notes and digital typing has raged since laptops first entered the lecture hall. Traditionalists argue that the physical act of writing aids memory retention, while tech advocates point to the speed and searchability of digital text.

However, for neurodiverse students, this isn't just a preference; it's a matter of accessibility. Let's break down the pros and cons, and explore how tools like Glean are creating a hybrid "third way."

The Case for Handwriting

Research suggests that handwriting forces you to synthesize information. Because you can't write as fast as a lecturer speaks, you have to process the idea and write down a summary. This "cognitive processing" helps cement the knowledge in your brain.

The Case for Digital

Speed and organisation are the winners here. Typing is generally faster, allowing you to capture more detail. Digital notes are also searchable, shareable, and back-up-able. You can't easy-search a physical notebook for "mitochondria" the night before an exam.

The Hybrid Solution: Audio Note-Taking

This is where software like Glean changes the game. It allows you to record the lecture audio while you type brief notes. Later, you can click on your text note, and it will play back exactly what was being said at that moment. This removes the anxiety of "missing something" and allows you to focus on listening and understanding, rather than frantic transcription.